MODERN MANS CONFLICT WITH HIS COLLECTIVE UNCONSCIOUS A PSYCHOANALYTICAL STUDY OF FORD MADOX FORDS CHARACTERS IN THE GOOD SOLDIER

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-III).03      10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-III).03      Published : Sep 3
Authored by : Safia Siddiqui , Khadija Riaz

03 Pages : 23-30

References

  • Berger, D. D. (2017). Identity, Knowledge, and Power: Ford Madox Ford’s The Good Soldier and Parade’s End. (Master’s thesis, Georgia State University). http://doi.org/10.57709/9575903
  • Ford, F. M. (2002). The Good Soldier. US: Electronic Classics Series The Pennsylvia State University.
  • Green, R. (1981). The ‘Exploded Traditions’ of Ford Madox Ford. ELH, 48(1), 217-230. http://doi.org/10.2307/2873018
  • Haslam, S. (2002). Fragmenting Modernism: Ford Madox Ford, The Novel and The Great War. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Hynes, S. (1972). The Epistemology of The Good Soldier. In R. A. Cassell (Ed.), Ford Madox Ford: Modern Judgements (pp. 97-106). London: Macmillan Press LTD.
  • Levenson, M. (1984). Character in The Good Soldier. Twentieth Century Literature, 30(4), 373-387. http://doi.org/10.2307/441407
  • Ludwig, R. M. (Ed.). (2016). Letters of Ford Madox Ford. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Nigro, F. G. (1992) Who Framed “The Good Soldier”? Dowell’s Story in Search of a Form. Studies in the Novel, 24(4), 381-391. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29532894
  • Saunders, M. (2012). Ford Madox Ford: A Dual Life: Volume II: The After-War World. UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2015). Theories of Personality (11th ed.). USA: UO South Florida.
  • Smith, J. F. (2017). The Motive for Metaphor: The Words of a Sentimentalist in The Good Soldier. In R. T. Artemis (Ed.), Ford Madox Ford’s The Good Soldier (pp. 91-110). Netherland: Brill Rodopi.
  • Stannard, M. (Ed.). (1995). The Good Soldier: Ford Madox Ford. London: Norton & Company.
  • Wiesenfarth, J. (1963). Criticism and The Semiosis of “The Good Soldier.” Modern Fiction Studies, 9(1), 39-49. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26278742

References

  • Berger, D. D. (2017). Identity, Knowledge, and Power: Ford Madox Ford’s The Good Soldier and Parade’s End. (Master’s thesis, Georgia State University). http://doi.org/10.57709/9575903
  • Ford, F. M. (2002). The Good Soldier. US: Electronic Classics Series The Pennsylvia State University.
  • Green, R. (1981). The ‘Exploded Traditions’ of Ford Madox Ford. ELH, 48(1), 217-230. http://doi.org/10.2307/2873018
  • Haslam, S. (2002). Fragmenting Modernism: Ford Madox Ford, The Novel and The Great War. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Hynes, S. (1972). The Epistemology of The Good Soldier. In R. A. Cassell (Ed.), Ford Madox Ford: Modern Judgements (pp. 97-106). London: Macmillan Press LTD.
  • Levenson, M. (1984). Character in The Good Soldier. Twentieth Century Literature, 30(4), 373-387. http://doi.org/10.2307/441407
  • Ludwig, R. M. (Ed.). (2016). Letters of Ford Madox Ford. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Nigro, F. G. (1992) Who Framed “The Good Soldier”? Dowell’s Story in Search of a Form. Studies in the Novel, 24(4), 381-391. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29532894
  • Saunders, M. (2012). Ford Madox Ford: A Dual Life: Volume II: The After-War World. UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2015). Theories of Personality (11th ed.). USA: UO South Florida.
  • Smith, J. F. (2017). The Motive for Metaphor: The Words of a Sentimentalist in The Good Soldier. In R. T. Artemis (Ed.), Ford Madox Ford’s The Good Soldier (pp. 91-110). Netherland: Brill Rodopi.
  • Stannard, M. (Ed.). (1995). The Good Soldier: Ford Madox Ford. London: Norton & Company.
  • Wiesenfarth, J. (1963). Criticism and The Semiosis of “The Good Soldier.” Modern Fiction Studies, 9(1), 39-49. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26278742

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Siddiqui, S., & Riaz, K. (2022). Modern Man's Conflict with His Collective Unconscious: A Psychoanalytical Study of Ford Madox Ford's Characters in The Good Soldier. Global Sociological Review, VII(III), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-III).03

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Siddiqui, Safia, and Khadija Riaz. 2022. "Modern Man's Conflict with His Collective Unconscious: A Psychoanalytical Study of Ford Madox Ford's Characters in The Good Soldier." Global Sociological Review, VII (III): 23-30 doi: 10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-III).03

HARVARD

    HARVARD : SIDDIQUI, S. & RIAZ, K. 2022. Modern Man's Conflict with His Collective Unconscious: A Psychoanalytical Study of Ford Madox Ford's Characters in The Good Soldier. Global Sociological Review, VII, 23-30.

MHRA

    MHRA : Siddiqui, Safia, and Khadija Riaz. 2022. "Modern Man's Conflict with His Collective Unconscious: A Psychoanalytical Study of Ford Madox Ford's Characters in The Good Soldier." Global Sociological Review, VII: 23-30

MLA

    MLA : Siddiqui, Safia, and Khadija Riaz. "Modern Man's Conflict with His Collective Unconscious: A Psychoanalytical Study of Ford Madox Ford's Characters in The Good Soldier." Global Sociological Review, VII.III (2022): 23-30 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Siddiqui, Safia and Riaz, Khadija (2022), "Modern Man's Conflict with His Collective Unconscious: A Psychoanalytical Study of Ford Madox Ford's Characters in The Good Soldier", Global Sociological Review, VII (III), 23-30

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Siddiqui, Safia, and Khadija Riaz. "Modern Man's Conflict with His Collective Unconscious: A Psychoanalytical Study of Ford Madox Ford's Characters in The Good Soldier." Global Sociological Review VII, no. III (2022): 23-30. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-III).03