OPPRESSION AND FEMALE BODY A FEMINIST CRITIQUE OF THE NOVEL HALF THE SKY

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2021(VI-I).11      10.31703/gsr.2021(VI-I).11      Published : Mar 2021
Authored by : Ayesha Khaliq , Mamona Yasmin Khan , Rabia Hayat

11 Pages : 79-85

References

  • Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Bhasin, K. 2006. What Is Patriarchy? Women Unlimited: New Delhi
  • Bhatnagar, M., & Singh, P. K. (2013). Research Methodology as SDLC Process in Image Processing. International Journal of Computer Applications, 77(2).
  • d'Eaubonne F (1994) A time for ecofeminism. In: Merchant C (ed.), Key concepts in critical theory: Ecology. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ. pp: 174-197.
  • De Beauvoir, S. (2010). The second sex. Knopf.
  • Farley, M. (2003).Prostitution and the invisibility of harm. Women & Therapy, 26(3-4), 247-280.
  • Fatima, A. (2019). Representations of Women's Role in Pakistan: A Critical Analysis through Drama Serials. Journal of International Women's Studies, 20(3), 3-16.
  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.
  • Gray, K., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Barrett, L. F. (2011). More than a body: mind perception and the nature of objectification. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101(6), 1207.
  • Heise, (1998). ‘Violence against Women: An Integrated, Ecological Framework'. Violence against Women 4 (3): 262-90.
  • Hemmings, C. (2005). Telling feminist stories. Feminist theory, 6(2), 115-139.
  • Keith, L. C. (1999). The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Does it make a difference in human rights behavior?. Journal of Peace Research, 36(1), 95-118.
  • Knight, R. A., & Sims-Knight, J. E. (2003). The developmental antecedents of sexual coercion against women: Testing alternative hypotheses with structural equation modeling. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989(1), 72-85.
  • Lerner, G. (2005) The majority finds its past: Placing women in history. University of North Carolina Press, Charlotte, North Carolina.
  • Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press, USA.
  • McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181-215.
  • Monto, M. A. (2000). Why men seek out prostitutes. Sex for sale: Prostitution, pornography, and the sex industry, 67-83.
  • Niaz, U. (2003). Violence against women in South Asian countries. Archives of women's mental health, 6(3), 173-184.
  • Prilleltensky, I., & Gonick, L. (1996). Polities change, oppression remains: On the psychology and politics of oppression. Political psychology, 127-148.
  • Schutt, R. K. (2006). Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? Marxism and the interpretation of culture. C. Nelson and L. Grossberg. Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 271-313.
  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of family issues, 17(3), 283-316.
  • Urry, J., & Larsen, J. (2011). The tourist gaze 3.0. Sage.
  • Walter, N. (1998). The new feminism.

References

  • Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Bhasin, K. 2006. What Is Patriarchy? Women Unlimited: New Delhi
  • Bhatnagar, M., & Singh, P. K. (2013). Research Methodology as SDLC Process in Image Processing. International Journal of Computer Applications, 77(2).
  • d'Eaubonne F (1994) A time for ecofeminism. In: Merchant C (ed.), Key concepts in critical theory: Ecology. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ. pp: 174-197.
  • De Beauvoir, S. (2010). The second sex. Knopf.
  • Farley, M. (2003).Prostitution and the invisibility of harm. Women & Therapy, 26(3-4), 247-280.
  • Fatima, A. (2019). Representations of Women's Role in Pakistan: A Critical Analysis through Drama Serials. Journal of International Women's Studies, 20(3), 3-16.
  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.
  • Gray, K., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Barrett, L. F. (2011). More than a body: mind perception and the nature of objectification. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101(6), 1207.
  • Heise, (1998). ‘Violence against Women: An Integrated, Ecological Framework'. Violence against Women 4 (3): 262-90.
  • Hemmings, C. (2005). Telling feminist stories. Feminist theory, 6(2), 115-139.
  • Keith, L. C. (1999). The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Does it make a difference in human rights behavior?. Journal of Peace Research, 36(1), 95-118.
  • Knight, R. A., & Sims-Knight, J. E. (2003). The developmental antecedents of sexual coercion against women: Testing alternative hypotheses with structural equation modeling. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989(1), 72-85.
  • Lerner, G. (2005) The majority finds its past: Placing women in history. University of North Carolina Press, Charlotte, North Carolina.
  • Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press, USA.
  • McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181-215.
  • Monto, M. A. (2000). Why men seek out prostitutes. Sex for sale: Prostitution, pornography, and the sex industry, 67-83.
  • Niaz, U. (2003). Violence against women in South Asian countries. Archives of women's mental health, 6(3), 173-184.
  • Prilleltensky, I., & Gonick, L. (1996). Polities change, oppression remains: On the psychology and politics of oppression. Political psychology, 127-148.
  • Schutt, R. K. (2006). Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? Marxism and the interpretation of culture. C. Nelson and L. Grossberg. Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 271-313.
  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of family issues, 17(3), 283-316.
  • Urry, J., & Larsen, J. (2011). The tourist gaze 3.0. Sage.
  • Walter, N. (1998). The new feminism.

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Khaliq, A., Khan, M. Y., & Hayat, R. (2021). Oppression and Female Body: A Feminist Critique of the Novel 'Half the Sky'. Global Sociological Review, VI(I), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2021(VI-I).11

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Khaliq, Ayesha, Mamona Yasmin Khan, and Rabia Hayat. 2021. "Oppression and Female Body: A Feminist Critique of the Novel 'Half the Sky'." Global Sociological Review, VI (I): 79-85 doi: 10.31703/gsr.2021(VI-I).11

HARVARD

    HARVARD : KHALIQ, A., KHAN, M. Y. & HAYAT, R. 2021. Oppression and Female Body: A Feminist Critique of the Novel 'Half the Sky'. Global Sociological Review, VI, 79-85.

MHRA

    MHRA : Khaliq, Ayesha, Mamona Yasmin Khan, and Rabia Hayat. 2021. "Oppression and Female Body: A Feminist Critique of the Novel 'Half the Sky'." Global Sociological Review, VI: 79-85

MLA

    MLA : Khaliq, Ayesha, Mamona Yasmin Khan, and Rabia Hayat. "Oppression and Female Body: A Feminist Critique of the Novel 'Half the Sky'." Global Sociological Review, VI.I (2021): 79-85 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Khaliq, Ayesha, Khan, Mamona Yasmin, and Hayat, Rabia (2021), "Oppression and Female Body: A Feminist Critique of the Novel 'Half the Sky'", Global Sociological Review, VI (I), 79-85

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Khaliq, Ayesha, Mamona Yasmin Khan, and Rabia Hayat. "Oppression and Female Body: A Feminist Critique of the Novel 'Half the Sky'." Global Sociological Review VI, no. I (2021): 79-85. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2021(VI-I).11