ARTICLE

ROLE OF SOCIOCULTURAL FACTORS TO IMPROVE ENGLISH LANGUAGE SKILLS AT SECONDARY SCHOOL LEVEL IN MULTAN DIVISION

08 Pages : 97-109

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2023(VIII-I).08      10.31703/gsr.2023(VIII-I).08      Published : Mar 2023

Role of Socio-cultural Factors to Improve English Language Skills at Secondary School Level in Multan Division

    English is taught in secondary schools in various countries, often as a required or recommended topic. Students need to want to learn the language. There are many reasons students should learn English, and schools can use these to encourage their pupils. The study's primary goal is to identify the contribution of cultural elements to the development of secondary school students' proficiency in English. It was an exercise in purely descriptive research. In order to get a representative sample of the population, the researchers adopted a multistage sampling strategy. The statistical methods of the mean score, standard deviation, and t-test were applied to the gathered data. In conclusion, secondary school students in Multan would greatly benefit from more exposure to different cultures to better their English language command. Young people's English proficiency can be fostered by creating English-speaking environments, cultural awareness, parent involvement, peer interaction, and student motivation.

    Sociocultural Factors, English Learning Skills, Secondary Schools
    (1) Humera Bhatti
    MS Scholar, Department of Education, University of Sialkot, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (2) Namra Munir
    Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Education, Lahore, Vehari Campus, Punjab, Pakistan.
    (3) Shamim
    MS Scholar, Department of Education, University of Sialkot, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Agar, M. (2011). Making sense of one other for another: Ethnography as translation. Language & Communication, 31(1), 38– 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2010.05.001
  • Amin, A., & Greenwood, J. (2018). The UN Sustainable Development Goals and Teacher Development for Effective English Teaching in Bangladesh: A Gap that Needs Bridging. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(2), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0019
  • Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57– 64. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.1.57
  • Aveni, V. A. P. (2005). Study abroad and second language use: Constructing the self. Cambridge University Press.
  • Byrd, D. R., Hlas, A. C., Watzke, J. L., & Valencia, M. F. M. (2011). An Examination of Culture Knowledge: A Study of L2 Teachers’ and Teacher Educators’ Beliefs and Practices. Foreign Language Annals, 44(1), 4– 39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01117.x
  • Guest, M. (2002). A critical ‘checkbook' for culture teaching and learning. ELT Journal, 56(2), 154- 161.
  • Hedegaard, M., Chaiklin, S., & Jensen, U. J. (1999). Activity theory and social practice: An introduction. Activity Theory and Social Practice, 12-30.
  • Kabilan, M. K., & Khan, M. (2012). Assessing pre- service English language teachers’ learning using e-portfolios: Benefits, challenges and competencies gained. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1007– 1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.011
  • Kiliçkaya, F. (2004). Authentic Materials and Cultural Content in EFL Classrooms. The Internet TESL Journal, 10(7)
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (Eds.). (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Greenwood Publishing Group
  • Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • Liddicoat, A. J., Papademetre, L., Scarino, A., & Kohler, M. (2003). Report on intercultural language learning.
  • Lynn, M. (2004). Inserting the ‘Race’into Critical Pedagogy: An analysis of ‘race-based epistemologies’. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(2), 153-165
  • Matsumoto, M. (2011). Expectations and realities of education in post-conflict Sierra Leone: A reflection of society or a driver for peacebuilding. Education, conflict and development, 119-144.
  • McKay, S. L., & Wong, S. L. C. (2000). New immigrants in the United States. New York, NY.
  • Ogden, R. (2012). The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction – Introduction to the Special Issue. Language and Speech, 55(1), 3– 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830911433559
  • Ohta, A. S. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 93-121. https://doi.org/10.5070/l462005219
  • Sharifian, F., & Palmer, G. A. (2007). Applied Cultural Linguistics. In John Benjamins Publishing Company eBooks. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.7
  • Philp, J., Walter, S., & Basturkmen, H. (2010). Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: what factors foster a focus on form? Language Awareness, 19(4), 261– 279. 1 https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.51683
  • Risager, K. (2011). The cultural dimensions of language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 44(4), 485– 499. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444811000280
  • Schulz, R. A. (2007). The Challenge of Assessing Cultural Understanding in the Context of Foreign Language Instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 9– 26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02851.x
  • Shohamy, E. (2007). Language tests as language policy tools. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(1), 117– 130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701272948
  • Svalberg, A. M. (2007). Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching, 40(4), 287-308.
  • Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
  • Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180

Cite this article

    APA : Bhatti, H., Munir, N., & Shamim. (2023). Role of Socio-cultural Factors to Improve English Language Skills at Secondary School Level in Multan Division. Global Sociological Review, VIII(I), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2023(VIII-I).08
    CHICAGO : Bhatti, Humera, Namra Munir, and Shamim. 2023. "Role of Socio-cultural Factors to Improve English Language Skills at Secondary School Level in Multan Division." Global Sociological Review, VIII (I): 97-109 doi: 10.31703/gsr.2023(VIII-I).08
    HARVARD : BHATTI, H., MUNIR, N. & SHAMIM. 2023. Role of Socio-cultural Factors to Improve English Language Skills at Secondary School Level in Multan Division. Global Sociological Review, VIII, 97-109.
    MHRA : Bhatti, Humera, Namra Munir, and Shamim. 2023. "Role of Socio-cultural Factors to Improve English Language Skills at Secondary School Level in Multan Division." Global Sociological Review, VIII: 97-109
    MLA : Bhatti, Humera, Namra Munir, and Shamim. "Role of Socio-cultural Factors to Improve English Language Skills at Secondary School Level in Multan Division." Global Sociological Review, VIII.I (2023): 97-109 Print.
    OXFORD : Bhatti, Humera, Munir, Namra, and Shamim, (2023), "Role of Socio-cultural Factors to Improve English Language Skills at Secondary School Level in Multan Division", Global Sociological Review, VIII (I), 97-109
    TURABIAN : Bhatti, Humera, Namra Munir, and Shamim. "Role of Socio-cultural Factors to Improve English Language Skills at Secondary School Level in Multan Division." Global Sociological Review VIII, no. I (2023): 97-109. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2023(VIII-I).08