PSYCHOLOGISTS AS EXPERT WITNESSES IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN COURTS IN PAKISTAN

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-IV).06      10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-IV).06      Published : Dec 2022
Authored by : Ali Ajmal , Bushra Nasim , Faiza Rasool

06 Pages : 46-51

References

  • Arif ud Din v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1129
  • Article 2(d) of Qanoon-e- Shahadat Order, 1984
  • Article 59 of Qanoon-e- Shahadat Order, 1984
  • Article 164 of Qanoon-e- Shahadat Order, 1984
  • Bartol, C. R. & Bartol, A. M. (1987). History of forensic psychology. In I. B. Weiner & A. K. Hess (Eds), Handbook of Forensic Psychology (pp. 3-21). New York: Wiley
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022). Psychologists: Occupational Outlook Handbook. USA. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/life-physical-and-social-science/psychologists.htm
  • Colman, A. M. (1995). Testifying in court as an expert witness. In Professional psychology handbook (Section II, pp. 70-79). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
  • Constitution Pakistan Psychological Association. (2013). Rules and Regulations (Chapter 3). Section 1 of Pakistan Psychological Association.
  • Cutler, J. & Griffin, E. F. (1868). Edmund Powell, Principles & Practice of the Law of Evidence (3rd Ed.) Kessinger Publishing, London: Butterworths.
  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993)
  • Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
  • General Electric Co. v. Joiner (1997)
  • Grisso, T. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
  • Grover, R. & Murphy, P. (2013). Murphy on Evidence (13th Ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jenkins v. United States, 307 F.2d 637 (D.C. App. 1962).
  • Kashif Nawaz v. The State 2018 YLR 1084
  • Khalid Rasheed v. State 2012 MLD 1274
  • Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (1999)
  • Loh, W. D. (1981). Perspectives on psychology and law. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 314–355.
  • Muhammad Hayat v. State 2016 PCrLJ Note 121
  • Mukhtar Alias Mokhi v. The State 2018 YLR 1302
  • Niaz Alias Niazzo v. State 2015 YLR 2255
  • Odom v. State, 174 Ala. 4, 7, 56 So. 913, 914 (1911).
  • People v. Hawthorne, 293 Mich. 15, 291 N.W. 205 (1940).
  • Ranchhoddas, R. & Thakore, D. K. (2016). The Law of Evidence (ed. 24). New York, United States: Lexis Nexis.
  • Rizwan Ahmad Qureshi v. State PLD 2017 Sindh 653
  • Safia Bano v. Home Department and others, Government of Punjab PLD (2021) SC 488
  • Sarathi, V. P. (1972). Historical Background of Indian Evidence Act 1872. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 2(Special Issue), 1-25.
  • Sardar Ali v. Special Judge 1996 MLD 460
  • Section (2) (1) (g) of Indian Mental Health Act, 2017
  • Section 2(f) of the Punjab Forensic Science Agency Act 2007
  • Section 3 of the Rehabilitation Council of India Act, 1992
  • Section 3(f) of Investigation for Fair Trial Act, 2013
  • Section 5 of Health Care and Associated Professions (Miscellaneous Amendments and Practitioners Psychologists) Order, 2009
  • Section 84 of Pakistan Penal Code
  • Shaukat Ali Alias Baba v. State 2016 PCrLJ Note 33
  • The State v. Shakeel Ahmad 2015 MLD 1374
  • Weiner, I. B. & Otto, R. K. (2013). The Handbook of Forensic Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
  • Wigmore, J. H. (1940). Evidence in trials at common law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
  • Zeeshan Alias Shani v. State 2012 SCMR 428
  • Arif ud Din v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1129
  • Article 2(d) of Qanoon-e- Shahadat Order, 1984
  • Article 59 of Qanoon-e- Shahadat Order, 1984
  • Article 164 of Qanoon-e- Shahadat Order, 1984
  • Bartol, C. R. & Bartol, A. M. (1987). History of forensic psychology. In I. B. Weiner & A. K. Hess (Eds), Handbook of Forensic Psychology (pp. 3-21). New York: Wiley
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2022). Psychologists: Occupational Outlook Handbook. USA. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/life-physical-and-social-science/psychologists.htm
  • Colman, A. M. (1995). Testifying in court as an expert witness. In Professional psychology handbook (Section II, pp. 70-79). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
  • Constitution Pakistan Psychological Association. (2013). Rules and Regulations (Chapter 3). Section 1 of Pakistan Psychological Association.
  • Cutler, J. & Griffin, E. F. (1868). Edmund Powell, Principles & Practice of the Law of Evidence (3rd Ed.) Kessinger Publishing, London: Butterworths.
  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993)
  • Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
  • General Electric Co. v. Joiner (1997)
  • Grisso, T. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
  • Grover, R. & Murphy, P. (2013). Murphy on Evidence (13th Ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jenkins v. United States, 307 F.2d 637 (D.C. App. 1962).
  • Kashif Nawaz v. The State 2018 YLR 1084
  • Khalid Rasheed v. State 2012 MLD 1274
  • Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (1999)
  • Loh, W. D. (1981). Perspectives on psychology and law. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 314–355.
  • Muhammad Hayat v. State 2016 PCrLJ Note 121
  • Mukhtar Alias Mokhi v. The State 2018 YLR 1302
  • Niaz Alias Niazzo v. State 2015 YLR 2255
  • Odom v. State, 174 Ala. 4, 7, 56 So. 913, 914 (1911).
  • People v. Hawthorne, 293 Mich. 15, 291 N.W. 205 (1940).
  • Ranchhoddas, R. & Thakore, D. K. (2016). The Law of Evidence (ed. 24). New York, United States: Lexis Nexis.
  • Rizwan Ahmad Qureshi v. State PLD 2017 Sindh 653
  • Safia Bano v. Home Department and others, Government of Punjab PLD (2021) SC 488
  • Sarathi, V. P. (1972). Historical Background of Indian Evidence Act 1872. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 2(Special Issue), 1-25.
  • Sardar Ali v. Special Judge 1996 MLD 460
  • Section (2) (1) (g) of Indian Mental Health Act, 2017
  • Section 2(f) of the Punjab Forensic Science Agency Act 2007
  • Section 3 of the Rehabilitation Council of India Act, 1992
  • Section 3(f) of Investigation for Fair Trial Act, 2013
  • Section 5 of Health Care and Associated Professions (Miscellaneous Amendments and Practitioners Psychologists) Order, 2009
  • Section 84 of Pakistan Penal Code
  • Shaukat Ali Alias Baba v. State 2016 PCrLJ Note 33
  • The State v. Shakeel Ahmad 2015 MLD 1374
  • Weiner, I. B. & Otto, R. K. (2013). The Handbook of Forensic Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
  • Wigmore, J. H. (1940). Evidence in trials at common law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
  • Zeeshan Alias Shani v. State 2012 SCMR 428

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Ajmal, Ali, Bushra Nasim, and Faiza Rasool. 2022. "Psychologists as Expert Witnesses in Criminal Matters in Courts in Pakistan." Global Sociological Review, VII (IV): 46-51 doi: 10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-IV).06
    HARVARD : AJMAL, A., NASIM, B. & RASOOL, F. 2022. Psychologists as Expert Witnesses in Criminal Matters in Courts in Pakistan. Global Sociological Review, VII, 46-51.
    MHRA : Ajmal, Ali, Bushra Nasim, and Faiza Rasool. 2022. "Psychologists as Expert Witnesses in Criminal Matters in Courts in Pakistan." Global Sociological Review, VII: 46-51
    MLA : Ajmal, Ali, Bushra Nasim, and Faiza Rasool. "Psychologists as Expert Witnesses in Criminal Matters in Courts in Pakistan." Global Sociological Review, VII.IV (2022): 46-51 Print.
    OXFORD : Ajmal, Ali, Nasim, Bushra, and Rasool, Faiza (2022), "Psychologists as Expert Witnesses in Criminal Matters in Courts in Pakistan", Global Sociological Review, VII (IV), 46-51
    TURABIAN : Ajmal, Ali, Bushra Nasim, and Faiza Rasool. "Psychologists as Expert Witnesses in Criminal Matters in Courts in Pakistan." Global Sociological Review VII, no. IV (2022): 46-51. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-IV).06